Friday, August 24, 2007

Gang culture and street killings

August 2007: From media reports, there is every semblance of an increase of street violence, especially affecting young people. The increase may be real, or it may be due merely to increased reporting, since it is quite possible for the media filters to create these apparent increases – as happened, for instance, with the great Bristol Baby snatching wave in the 60s or 70s, which turned out to be a media illusion. In fact, even if there is no increase, we ought to address the problem of street violence. What can be done?

Immediately, a babble of slogans come to mind, mainly of a punitive kind: “Blame the parents” Blame the schools” “Bring back the cane”. The Government will undoubtedly bring out another piece of Asbo-type legislation – tough, as usual, on crime, but completely blind to the causes of crime, because looking at the causes of crime would involve Government in radical thinking, and in challenges to business, and Government is averse to both. There is no one, single, magic-bullet solution to the problem; this is a problem with a human social system, and only a systems approach, covering many changes, preferably simultaneously, will help to solve it.

In the Green Party we have enough expertise and pre-existent policy to make a fairly decent set of recommendations. Why not set about to try to put something together on-line here, going for a holistic, multifactorial approach? This could be presented when complete as a blueprint for correcting the violent tendencies in society.

The problem will demand a systems approach, gathering together all the many and diverse factors that create gang culture and delinquency, since human society is a system, which means that each constituent part contributes to the whole, and the whole has an effect on each part.

The aspects that need to be discussed are: Physical, Psychological, familial, community and social, cultural, juridical, economic and ethical.

Physical

There is sound evidence for the effects on behaviour of toxins (e.g. lead) and diet on community behaviour. Environmental cleanups, and taxes on food additives, will make fundamental changes to behaviour.

At the other end of the physical spectrum is the matter of availability of guns and knives. Clearly it is time for another amnesty on weapons, which not only reduces the availability, but also sends a signal to society of their unacceptability. There are already laws governing carrying of weapons.

Ammunition can easily be identified by trained dogs. The number of these dogs can be increased, and if they are sited at the point where crows are in file, for instance, at the head of escalators, they can pick out individuals carrying firearms.

All guns should have their ballistic identity established prior to sale. Anyone buying a gun should be put through psychological profiling. The costs of all gun and ammunition control measure should be put on the item itself, through increased VAT.

Psychological

A gang is an extended ego, and an immature ego defines itself in opposition to other selves or gangs. A perception of not belonging to the greater society will create a gang culture. It may be that the absence of any rite of passage in our society contributes to the gang culture. This is a matter where Government should commission a review of the literature.

Lack of self esteem is commonly thought to lie at the root of anti-social behaviour. In fact, the evidence points the other way, and that most anti-social individuals think too much of their own needs and not enough of the needs of others.

Familial

Parent craft can be taught to failing parents, and can also be added to the school syllabus. The problem is to persuade Government to supply the funding for training up parent craft teachers, and for the process of teaching. Experience in the NHS shows that when parent craft was adopted as a strategy, it was expected to be taught by health visitors out of existing budgets.

Community and society

It is known that the sense of community can be built up by means of well-resourced community workers. http://www.greenhealth.org.uk/BillsofHealth.soc.htm

One worker and a dedicated communal space can make a significant difference to the way a community functions. The outlay from government would be trivial, the benefits enormous.

It may be that certain exceptional people will form their own neighbourhood response to the threat of street violence. Some may even take direct action, either in terms of vigilantism, or preventive, by closing outlets of guns and knives, perhaps by super-gluing the locks of local gun and knife shops, or by publicly smashing violent video games and CDs.

The community reaction is the key to successful action since anti-social behaviour is essentially anti-social. Philosophically, society is now a difficult concept. Although Margaret Thatcher’s famous dictum “There is no such thing as society” is now quietly rejected by her own party, the philosophy of individualism still underpins all economic thinking, in the shape of free-market capitalism. Corporations are granted the status of legal individuals, with the rights of a real person, but only limited responsibility, enshrined in the legal framework of limited liability. This pervasive individualism (which expresses itself in common thought as “You’ve got to look after number one”) needs to be challenged philosophically. There is such a thing as society, and society needs to reassert its claims over the delinquent individual and delinquent groups.


Cultural

The intellectual establishment is in denial over the evidence regarding the effect of culture on behaviour. There is strong resistance to the idea that films, music and electronic games can influence what people do, but the evidence is nevertheless in existence. Since there is no consensus, Government should commission a review of the evidence. The problem here is that Government, due to free-market assumptions, and due to the way that political parties are financed, is not about to challenge the power of the film industry, since it would be accused of censorship. A courageous Government nevertheless would at least impose a levy on cultural products sufficient to pay for the research on their effects on society, and once consensus is achieved, to pay for the effects on society itself. The effects of media on behaviour is reviewed here: http://www.greenhealth.org.uk/BoHmediaImp.htm

In the mean time, it is up to families and communities to take direct action on violent cultural items if they are convinced that they are having a bad effect on the young by banning them and demonstratively destroying them in public.

Juridical

Government needs no encouragement to bring in new laws to punish or attempt to prevent crime. The principle is that punishment should fit the crime. Jail should only be used for individuals who are a danger to society. Community service (now renamed Unpaid Work) is the way forward. It is cheaper and more effective than prison. Unpaid work in forestry and gardening is particularly therapeutic.

Economic

A divided society can expect to find its youth alienated. The UK has a highly divergent economy, with the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. There is evidence that this has an adverse effect on health http://www.greenhealth.org.uk/BillsofHealth.pov.htm , and it is highly probable that it has a similar effect on anti-social behaviour. It would be highly challenging, but highly rewarding, to reform the UK economy so that the fortunes of rich and poor become convergent. At present, the benefit system tends to keep people in the unemployment trap. Citizen’s Income, implemented as a Green Wage Subsidy, is a cost-effective way of getting people off the dole and into good work.

Ethical

Alienation, anomie, boredom, pointlessness; all words that describe the attitude of a lost generation. In tribal societies, fifteen year old males are apprentice hunters, learning the skills of their elders while providing the athleticism and energy to make the kill. In some way, we need to re-position our urban youth. Sport is one way of sublimating energy. Paid community work, in improving the visual amenity, clearing rubbish, and helping old people with their gardens are all effective ways of increasing engagement.

Overall, street violence is one expression of the individualistic stance, where the planet and other people are obliged to serve the individual ego. This attitude has to be reversed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the only effective response to the increasing culture of violence is a holistic and systematic correction of many problems in our society and our economy. The needed reforms are radical, and will only come about when society has reached a point of desperation. It is our job to show that there is a rational plan of action available to rectify the situation.

Thursday, August 23, 2007

McDonald's: No such thing as 'junk food' | openDemocracy

I am getting into openDemocracy again:Courtney Hamilton wrote: Well, according to Stanley Feldman Emeritus professor of anaesthesiology at Charing Cross and Westminster Medical School, no matter what we eat, it all 'ends up as the same amino acids in your blood'.

I hate to have to say this of someone who is working at my old medical school, but Prof Feldman is an anaesthetist, not a nutritionist, so he is a bit off his specialty here, and it shows. I was taught the 'full breakdown into amino-acids' hypothesis at Westminster back in the 60s, but knowledge has moved on considerably since then.
It is known now that large chunks of foods (macromolecules) can get through into the bloodstream, and can set up various adverse reactions in the host.
It is also known that some pesticide residues are toxic to some individuals.
It is known that organic foods contain more micro-nutrients than industrially produced foods.
It is known that some people are adversely affected by some additives, mainly coal tar dyes and derivatives thereof.
It is known that some highly processed foods are deficient in some micronutrients. It is known that a growing number of people are intolerant of common foods.

There is a vast body of literature out this, under the heading of Clinical Ecology. The problem, as with all natural medicine, is that nobody can get a patent out of it, and randomised controlled double blind clinical trials are both expensive and very difficult and complex, so it is not studied as intensively as patent medicines. There is also a presumption among my colleagues that exclusion diets are difficult (they are not), that patients are reluctant to do them (they are not) and that they are not often effective (they are not), and that to do real medicine you need to give someone a pill.

For anyone who is really interested, British Society for Ecological Medicine is a good place to start. The book to read is Environmental Medicine in Clinical Practice (Anthony, Birtwistle Eaton and Maberley) BSAEMN Publications 1997.

"Dr Lawson regrets that he cannot enter into private correspondence".

Hope this helps.

PS I think it is closer to say that we are what we think we are, than to say we are what we eat.

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

The Philosophy of Individualism

Thanks for the comments Chris. As I said, it is work in progress, I am just trying to learn by dialogue.

There is a difference between Individuality (a perfectly sound concept) and the philosophy of Individualism, which attempts to build a world view of life, the universe and everything, based on the individual person. This is why Thatcher said "There is no such thing as Society". The only ultimate philosophical and political reality for her was the individual (though she allowed it to extend a little to "The Family"). Individualism is the root of free market capitalism, in that corporations have been granted the status in law of individual persons, with the same rights that are granted to a person (although, interestingly, less responsibilities than a person, thanks to "Limited Liability", a notion that is beginning to be challenged.

[In its extreme form Individualism comes through as libertarianism, which crosses all sorts of lines: extreme conservatives and extreme (as in Revolutionary Workers Party) socialists and anarchists all seem to flourish the libertarian flag.]

I started a debate on "The assumptions behind peoples' acceptance of militarism" on openDemocracy . It has turned to a discussion on the Philosophy of individualism. Here goes:

Individualism is the polar opposite to Socialism. They are both -isms, that is, both philosophies based on the absolutisation (in my own view, anyway) of one aspect of the human being. They are antithetical, that is, irreconcilable in their own terms.

I personally believe that they can be reconciled or achieve synthesis in the wider matrix of ecological philosophy, that is the philosophy that finds its startting point in our position as an element in the living system on a finite planet. Both individual and society depend on Nature to sustain them. By attending to the preservation and healing of our environment, we can overcome all sorts of conflicts. So in healing Nature, we can sort out the problems which are ascribed to our "human nature", because here I agree with you Chris, that it is our behaviour, not our "nature" which needs to be put right. Which is a much more hopeful way of looking at the state in which we find ourselves.

Sunday, August 19, 2007

Hurricane Trends

I have spent the morning patiently generating data from a Wikipedia article on hurricanes
and turning it into this fine picture (you have to click on it to see the latest years):


As you can see, the trend is up and down since 1950, more up than down in latter years, consistent with climate change theory. Then I find Kerry Emanuel's Graphics Pertaining to Tropical Cyclone Trends and Variability which, if you click here show a very close relationship between sea temperature and hurricane/cyclone intensity, as expected.

So at very least, the perception of increased hurricanes is consistent with global warming. All the more reason to adopt the hurricane nomenclature suggested y Greenpeace a few years ago: Hurricane Esso, Hurricane Texaco &c.

[update 13.12.09
I have combined, in an amateur way,using MSPaint, two graphs, one of hurricane intensity, and one of global temperature. It shows a fair fit between the two. By the way, the red line is from a sceptic, showing a downward trend in latter years (as opposed to the upward trend over the longer period), except that hurricane intensity increases away from temperature after the Pinatubo volcano. Maybe there is a hurricane stimulating effect from the dust injected from the volcano. I make no claims for this, only an interesting observation. More research needed, to coin a phrase.



The jury is still out on this topic as far as I know, but the prima facie evidence it that there is a relationship between hurricanes and global temperature.

[Update 1.9.13: Goldenberg et al  find that hurricanes increased significantly between 1995 and 2000 in the North Atlantic.

Flemlose on Skeptical Science shows a clear trend of increasing major hurricanes and decrease in hurricanes and tropical storms worldwide 1970-2012
Here are his results:

end of update]

Climate change FAQs.