Showing posts with label Covid19. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Covid19. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 18, 2020

A Quick Look at the Let Covid Rip argument

A few influential extreme right-wing journalists like Julia Hartley-Brewer, Peter Hitchens and Isabel Oakeshott are getting hysterical over the current lockdown. There are several strands to their argument, such as Covid is no worse than the flu (wrong) and that masks are muzzles (daft) but one key argument is that we should just let it rip. 


The Let it Rip group lost the argument in Cabinet back in February 2020, but did not give up. 

In fact their policies may have been influencing the implementation of Johnson's C19 response, which would explain the many failures of Johnson's response to Covid, notably of Test and Trace .
 
Under Let if Rip, vulnerable people (elderly, hypertensives, smokers, obese, diabetics, cancer patients, etc) just hide away as best they can for the foreseeable future, and others carry on as normal, and the disease spreads rapidly among them without any hindrance.

This is like saying that everyone can pee in the swimming pool, but people who do not like swimming in dilute urine should just stay in one corner of the pool. All the vulnerable people listed above have relatives who are out there in society. Do they stay away from their vulnerable friends and relatives, or do they freely visit, with the chance of infecting them and causing them to die?

Life is not quite so simple as  journalists imagine.

Then there is the matter of exponential growth. The mathematical laws of exponential series means that the disease will spread very rapidly indeed, so a large segment of the working population will be ill to a varying degree - some mildly, some so severely that they cannot work. This in itself will affect the economy.

So what do we do with these very large numbers of ill people?
Do we try to treat them in hospital, or do we leave them at home?

If we try to treat them, the hospitals will soon be full of C19 patients.

This means that NHS staff will become ill, and elective work will stop, which is one of the main criticisms that Covid sceptics level against public health policies.

We could try to separate the NHS into Covid and non-Covid. We do have designated C19 hospitals, the Nightingale hospitals, but the fact is that we do not have enough staff to manage them. Also C19 would inevitably get into "clean" hospitals and attack staff and patients there. 

The alternative is that we do not try to treat your C19 (unless of course you are in the elite). If you get infected, the rule is you go home and sweat it out untreated. You may recover after a mild flu like illness, or you may die.

C19 is not a pleasant way to go.

This latter solution means giving up on the philosophy not just of the NHS, but of medicine and humanitarianism itself.

But hey, the ideology of libertarianism is the supreme ideology of all time, isn't it? It overrules every other philosophical and ethical concept?


So there we have a rough working out of the Let it Rip approach to Covid-19. 

There are many other aspects to it. Notably that Britain may find itself economically and socially isolated and quarantined from the rest of the world.

It would be good if journalists and interviewers would challenge Let It Rip advocates to spell out exactly what they are proposing, and if they would press for everyone to behave rationally and responsibly to do all we can to limit transmission: Hands, Face, Space, limit contacts, work from home if possible, and of course, press Johnson to set up an effective local Track and Trace system.

And set up Covid Air Management Systems for C19 patients everywhere. 
And PerSo units for all Nurses, Medics and other HCWs. And Air Dynamics Systems in all public spaces. 

And prioritise vaccines for front line health care workers, teachers, security guards, drivers, chefs and others who are vital to the continuation of the economy. 

But of course this will not happen, because this is Britain, where the ideology of Individualism is supreme.

Our destiny as a nation seems to be to provide the world with an object lesson in the absolute bitter end failure of the foolish ideology of individualism .

Sunday, November 01, 2020

THE EVIDENCE BASE FOR THE COVID AIR MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CAMS)


CAMS[1] is the project that aims to sequester expired air from Covid-19 patients from the room where they are being nursed in order to prevent infection of other patients and front-line health care workers (HCWs).

 

Summary

  1.            Covid-19 is spread by droplets, aerosols and touch
  2.           Patients suffering from Covid-19 (C19) emit infectious droplets and aerosols
  3.           Viruses in these aerosols can remain viable for hours
  4.           Droplets and aerosols contribute to Hospital Acquired C19 Infections (HACIs)
  5.           HACIs form a significant part of NHS hospital work
  6.           If expired air from Covid-19 patients is collected and filtered, the risk of HACIs must diminish
  7.            High Efficiency Particle Absorbing (HEPA) filters can capture C19


Demonstrating the effectiveness of CAMS in practice:

8               When CAMS is rolled out, longitudinal audits should provide evidence of lessened HACIs

            Audits may also provide evidence of benefit to C19 patients

 

The Evidence

“Droplet” refers to watery particles containing virus that fall to the ground within 2 metres; they are defined here as of size greater than 100 microns. Aerosol refers to particles of size less than 100 microns; they can remain suspended in the air for hours and can concentrate in still air.

It used to be thought that Sars-CoV-2 (the virus that causes Covid-19 disease) spread only through droplets and touch transfer. Recent work shows that aerosols are more important, and the WHO now accepts that aerosols are an important means of transmission[2].

Jianxin Ma[3] et al found that patients in earlier stages of C19 exhaled millions of Sars-Cov-2 units per hour. Ma found that “air sample data, despite the low positive rate, still show that the air in the hospitals that housed the COVID-19 patients was contaminated with SARS-CoV-2”.

Van Doremalen found that aerosolised Sars-CoV-2 may remain viable in the air for up to 3 hours[4].

Lednicky et al. found that viable (infectious) SARS-CoV-2 was present in aerosols within the hospital room of COVID-19 patients, that airborne virus was detected in the absence of healthcare aerosol-generating procedures, and that the virus strain detected in the aerosols matched with the virus strain isolated from a patient with acute COVID-19[5].

Jianxin Ma[6] states that “None of the 26 surface swabs collected from handles of various objects appeared positive for the virus (Supplementary Table 4). These observations seem to not support the widely held belief that direct transmission by contact with surfaces plays a major role in COVID-19 spread”[7].

If touch is less important in our estimation as a means of transmission, it follows that droplet and aerosol spread must become more important, given that there is no other known means of transmission.

 

Hospital Acquired Covid-19 Infections

A significant number of cases of Covid-19 are contracted in hospital. They form about 10-20% of hospitalised cases.

There are a large number of reports detailing nosocomial (hospital acquired) Covid infections, and the following is just a selection of some of the cases of known HACIs:

1.       Weston General Hospital, May 2020: 57 Hospital Acquired infections (HACIs). 18 patients died[8].

2.       University College Hospital 2nd March-12 April, 2020: of 435 C19 inpatients, 15% were HACIs. 24 died[9].

3.       Dublin: 50 cases, 14 died. March – May 2020[10]

4.       Manchester Tameside General Hospital, 18 cases of HACI September 2020[11]

5.       West Glamorgan Hospital: 60 C19 HACI’s , 8 die[12]

6.       12.5% of hospital C19 patients contracted the infection in hospital (n=1,564)[13].

7.       Up to 20% of hospitalised C19 patients caught it in hospital[14].

Here is a list of links to other papers instancing HACIs:

https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2008457

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32171076/

https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/55/6/2000544          

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology/article/prevention-of-nosocomial-covid19-another-challenge-of-the-pandemic/8D6ACB44E444BEF4C954F8D78EF8684A

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.08.20095687v1

 

It is clear that nosocomial infection is a serious problem with Covid. It causes problems for both patients and staff. Infection in staff reduces the supply of skilled medical and nursing personnel, which puts colleagues under stress. Stressed people are more vulnerable to infection, which may explain why so many medical and nursing staff of working age, who might be expected to have a mild form of Covid-19, have in fact died.  36 NHS doctors have died, but the number of NHS nurses who have died is difficult to establish. The International Council of nurses says that 1,500 nurses have died worldwide[15]. It is reported in August that the Covid-related deaths of more than 620 front-line NHS and social care staff are to be investigated[16].

It is important that we consider seriously any technology that may lead to reducing HACIs.

Masks are helpful both for preventing spread from and to the mask wearer, but by no means a perfect defence against infection.

Southampton University has developed a system, PerSo, that filters air and supplies it to the HCW in a hood. It was developed in one week, and has been under official assessment for some five months[17].

 

Technologies designed to reduce HACIs

Professor Monty of the department of the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Melbourne University has developed a personal ventilation hood[18] that filters all exhaled air from a Covid-19 patient. It is on the verge of being available on the market.

A similar technology is being developed in Minnesota, the Aerosol Hood, with a rigid hood fitted with iris ports to allow HCWs to access the patient[19].

 

Effectiveness of Filters to capture Viruses

Here[20] is a useful background to HEPA filters which are in routine use in civil airliners.

Zhang et al[21] found that high-efficiency residential HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) HEPA filters were effective at capturing airborne virus particles in the air passing through the filter.  The filters tested were HEPA standard, and the virus used in their experiments were significantly smaller than Sars-CoV-2.

NASA work on spacecraft air purification confirms the efficacy of HEPA and carbon filters in removing particles smaller than Sars-CoV-2[22].

The above should establish the desirability of providing hospitals and care homes with one CAMS unit for every C19 patient.

Audit evidence

When CAMS or similar technologies are rolled out, it is to be expected that the levels of HACIs in the institution will be reduced. This hypothesis can be tested by comparing the rate of infection in front-line HCWs before the CAMS is introduced and after it is introduced. The experiment could be controlled by removing the filter from the system, but that would clearly be unethical.

A second hypothesis is that a patient suffering from C19 who is continually reinfecting themselves with the virus by rebreathing aerosols and touching fomites (infected surfaces such as their own bedclothes) will take longer to recover than a patient who is not rebreathing virus to the same extent. Examination of outcomes from patients who are given CAMS technology will test this hypothesis.

 

Cost of one CAMS unit

A rough estimate for one unit:

                                                £

                Hood                     20

                Tube                      5

                HEPA filter          30

                Fan                         10

                Labour                  50

    Marketing           50  

                TOTAL                   165

 

 

Conclusion

There can be no reasonable doubt that sequestering droplets and aerosols emitted from C19 patients will reduce the probability that health care workers attending these patients, and people breathing air in the same building as those patients may contract C19.


R H Lawson

MB BS, MRCPsych

01/11/2020

 

References



[4] van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al.   Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 : 1564–7 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmc2004973

[5] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.025

[6] https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1283/5898624

[7] https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1283/5898624

[21] Study of Viral Filtration Performance of Residential HVAC Filters.  Zhang, John; Huntley, Doug; Fox, Andy; Gerhardt, Bryan; Vatine, Al; Cherne, John. ASHRAE Journal . Aug2020 https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/technical%20resources/covid-19/zhang_digital-first.pdf

 

[22] Submicron and Nanoparticulate Matter Removal by HEPA-Rated Media Filters and Packed Beds of Granular Materials J.L. Perry et al.  https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170005166

 

 

 

© R Lawson


Wednesday, October 28, 2020

Get an Air Purifier for Christmas

Christmas is coming, the great get-together time of families and friends. 

This is the very last thing that epidemiologists and medics want to happen in terms of the Covid-19 pandemic. 

There will be advice from Government on how many family members are allowed to get together, for how long and how close.

The bedrock advice of Hands, Face and Space will remain valid.

Many people (let's call them the Wise Virgins) will adhere to the official advice. Some (let's call them the Foolish Virgins) will not, and will have large Christmas gatherings at work and at home where many will become more or less rat-arsed, and forget the rules.

In both groups, virus will be transmitted; more so in the case of the Foolish Virgins but the inescapable fact is that if the number of people sharing air in a room goes up, so too does the probability that virus will be transmitted from person to person.

It is impossible to eat a Christmas dinner with a mask on, and people will be laughing, shouting and even singing. Droplets will be exchanged, and there will be a spike in cases in the first week of the New Year, and, sadly, a spike in deaths in late January.

But. 

There is something we can do to reduce the probability of these spikes.

We can of course have Christmas dinner outside, but let's face it, very few if any will do this.

We can also open all the windows and keep the air moving through the house. Some will do this, but, let's face it, not everyone will.

There is something else that we can do, comfortably.

Let's take the case of a family of Wise Virgins  sitting around the table eating their Christmas dinner. The oldest boy, let's call him Colin, has just come back from Uni. He had a private test last week, and it came back negative, but unknown to him, five days ago one of his flat mates coughed over him and now he is an pre-symptomatic carrier. Not a lot, (virus shedding is maximal on the day symptoms start) but he is indeed putting out droplets containing Sars-Cov-2 virus (the virus that causes Covid-19 disease).

In the centre of the dinner table, hanging above it next to the table lamps, is a piece of technology called an Air Purifier. It is drawing in the air above the table, and passing it through a HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Absorbing) filter, combined with a variety of other processes depending on quality.

A large part of the virus particles chucked out by Colin will be trapped and killed in the Air Purifier. Instead of landing on the table, or hanging about in the air, or drying out and drifting as aerosols up the stairs into the rest of the house, they are safely trapped and die in the filter of the purifier.

Not all of them. Most of them. There is still a risk of transmission, but the Air Purifier reduces the probability of others round the table and in the room getting enough of a loading dose to get sick (the size of the loading dose is proportional to the severity of the subsequent illness).

It is all about probability. Nothing is black and white. Perfection is not on the agenda. Colin may forget his distancing, and may play with the 6 year old, who may get Covid. But the probability of transmission in a house with clean air is lower than it would be if the air is laden with Colin's virus.

The same goes for a family of Foolish Virgins. In aggregate, the spike in C19 cases will be less in houses that use Air Purifier technology.

Air purifiers are available widely. They cost anything from £40 to £700, but you can get a decent one for about £130 inc p+p. I like the Blue Air Pure 411 because it is very low wattage (1.5-10W). 

I am not on commission. I am writing this because I believe this technology will save lives and will ease the burden on my colleagues in hospital. I also believe that air management technology applied in many other ways will enable us to live far more normal lives than we otherwise would. Manufacturers will not claim that their products are guaranteed to stop people getting Covid, and of course we will hear the usual nonsense about how using air purifiers will make people stop wearing masks and washing their hands, but this kind of conservatism is inevitable for any innovation.

Buy one. Use it. Stay well, stay safe.

Saturday, October 10, 2020

We Need to Stop Right Wing Journalists from Crashing the Economy

We are not doing well in the great Covid sweepstake. 

Our death rate is the third highest in Europe, behind Belgium and Spain, according to Worldometer. 

Economically, the OECD finds that only Spain and Peru have had a deeper percentage decline in GDP than the UK.



Meanwhile the BBC has a non-ending discussion on "the balance between health and the economy", the fight against the pandemic and the fight against economic collapse. 

The fact is that we are losing on both fronts.

It is clear that we need first to suppress the virus in order to get  the economy moving again. Looking at the OECD graph above, the six countries who have suffered least economically are all between 90 and 189 in the league table of deaths per million, whereas we lie, shamefully, in the 12th position from the top. 

Why are we doing so badly? 

First, here is a list of 22 errors committed by Johnson's Tories in their handling of the pandemic. 

The other reason is that the BBC and other right wing media sources have been providing a continual obbligato of criticism of the lockdown measures. They give a platform to extreme libertarians who moan about their refusal to wear "muzzles", and how wrong it is that they should not be allowed to keep on drinking in the pub as long as they want. 

This grumbling was given apparent respectability by the Great Barrington Declaration  from a group associated with neo-liberalism from the same stock (and with the same Koch funding) as man-made climate change deniers.

This carping filters down into the popular consciousness into a spirit of non-compliance with social distancing, mask wearing and hand hygiene. This in turn pushes up the R-number, and this in turn prolongs the agony, and forces us all into more self-isolation and more job losses. 

We may even find ourselves in the position that the rest of the world is getting back to work (hopefully in greener economies) while we in the UK find ourselves quarantined if we visit these more sensible countries.

Nobody wants another lock-down. But we have to stop the increase in the R-number, and this means that somehow, we have to continue to exercise discipline on our interactions. The measures brought in on 22nd September have had an effect, as this graph from the excellent Symptom Tracker demonstrates:


The cases were growing exponentially until the rule of 6 and other new measures were brought in on 22nd September.

So hands, face and space does work. We just need to make sure that distancing is adhered to by everyone. 


And this means telling some influential journalists to support the public health agenda if they want to get the economy to pick up again.


Saturday, September 19, 2020

Indoor Air Dynamics Management (ADM) For Reducing Transmission of Covid-19

The current pandemic of Covid-19 is spread significantly by inhaling droplets from infected people who are within two metres or less. Outdoor transmission is rare: most droplet transmission happens indoors where there is little movement of the air mass.

This paper looks at ways in which this indoor transmission may be reduced, both in the clinical setting and in public spaces.

At the time of writing (September 2020) the pandemic is showing signs of a second wave at a time when Governments are very strongly motivated to get the economy moving again.  Infection control demands less interaction between people, but re-opening the economy demands more interaction.

ADM technology presents a major opportunity to help resolve these conflicting demands.

First, the core proposal is set out for clinical settings, then for auditoriums, and finally for places where people are moving about freely. Detailed considerations are set out in the second section of this paper.

This is a generic document. Other documents focused on hospitals, bus, train, auditoriums and clubs are available.

 

1.       Preventing transmission from Covid-19 cases in hospitals and nursing homes

People in hospitals and nursing homes who are known to be infected with Covid-19 are breathing out and coughing out droplets containing the virus Sars-CoV-2 (which causes the disease Covid-19) constantly and in large amounts, especially in the first week since symptoms began. The air in their vicinity and in their room will contain a considerable quantity of virus. Their bed coverings and the floor within a couple of metres will also be hosting significant amounts of virus. These clouds and  deposits of virus present a threat to anyone visiting or attending the patient.

Patients in hospital who are on CPAP or respirators do not cause this problem as their air is contained  in a closed circuit.

Patients undergoing procedures such as medical investigations also present a threat of infection to their attendants given that they may be asymptomatic carriers. Masks mitigate this risk to some extent, but the risk is still there.

This source of potential infection from asymptomatic carriers and/or Covid-19 patients who are not on respirators or closed circuit CPAP will be reduced significantly if the oxygen mask that they are using were to be adapted with a tube that will withdraw their exhaled breath from the room.

Each individual’s exhaled air tube will be connected to a manifold, and the total air removed from all patients in a hospital or nursing home would be passed through a unit that will apply effective sterilisation by chemical means (e.g. sodium hypochlorite mist), physical means (e.g. ultraviolet light or heat) , or a combination of both, before venting to the atmosphere.

Many modern hospitals have a centralised vacuum cleaning system that might well serve as a starting point for the air extraction ducts.

Heat exchangers should be added to minimise heat loss from the establishment in colder months.

In a refinement, the mask may be designed so that oxygen is supplied when the patients are in the inspiratory stage of their respiratory cycle and cut off when the patients are in the expiratory stage of their respiratory cycle. Conversely the exhaust air duct will open with the expiratory phase of the respiratory cycle and close when they are in the inspiratory phase of the respiratory cycle.

This alternate flow may be produced by simple valves fitted at the opening of the tubes in the mask, (See Fig 1), or by an electrically driven rotating valve fixed to the air lines (design available from author).

In a further refinement, for patients with severely compromised respiration, electrically actuated valves could be provided which would be controlled by information from sensors sited on the patient’s chest which would allow synchronised delivery and extraction of gases. The patient would receive useful assistance in respiration from this arrangement.

This positive technology which will substantially remove the virus from the hospital environment means that hospital acquired infections, whether by other patients or by front-line staff, would be greatly reduced. It would remove a great deal of stress from front line staff.

 

2.       Preventing transmission in auditoriums

Cinemas, music venues and theatres are adversely affected by the pandemic, since their capacity is severely restricted by the need for a safe 1 or 2 metre gap between customers. The same consideration applies to public transport.

ADM technology can allow these places and services to return safely to full capacity.

In places where people sit in rows of fixed seating, as in theatres and cinemas, each seating place will be provided with a double tube, one bringing in filtered and purified air, and one withdrawing exhaled air. The clients will each own their personal face mask (which will be available in the foyer) that will fit to the tube, and on breathing in they will receive filtered air, and on breathing out their breath will be drawn away to be sterilised  (see 1. above) before it is vented.

In a refinement of the system, the masks may be provided with valves that open the supply tube when the user breathes in, and opens the exhaust tube when the user breathes out.

As an addition to this system, exhaust air from the whole site can tested for presence of Sars-Cov-2. If the virus is found in the total exhaust, it may be made possible to sample air from specific parts of the room, and break down the testing to smaller and smaller sections until the row is (or rows are) identified that contains the person who is (or persons who are) the source of the virus.

In the case of places such as a conference or a lecture theatre, the people from that row can be called out and tested individually.

In the case of a theatre, people from the row that is showing infection can be notified in the interval of the performance that one of them is carrying the virus, and if individual testing is available, each person in the row can be tested during the interval.

 

3.       Offices

ADM technology can be applied to office workstations in various straightforward ways that are laid out in detail in a separate document available on request.

 

4.       Public transport

Some bus companies have introduced simple ventilation to their buses. This is better than having no ventilation, but it has drawbacks since horizontal movement of air from a person who is putting out Sars-CpV-2 particles is known to be able to cause spread. ADM technology can be easily applied to buses and trains. Details will be posted here soon.

5.       Dance halls, public houses, and crowded spaces

In some situations, it is impractical to wear masks that deliver to, and remove air from, each individual. Places like dance halls, pubs, clubs, locations where people are required to queue, and places where social distancing is impractical, are areas where the risk of viral transmission is high.

In these situations, the aim should be to create vertical air dynamics. Purified air can be introduced at a level of about 1 metre from the floor. These would be delivered from vents fitted to the wall, by pillars and under tables. Air would be extracted from funnels placed a little above head height, collected, and sterilised (as in 1. above) before venting. This arrangement will mean that exhaled droplets and aerosols are drawn upwards and away from other people. Transmission is still possible with this arrangement, but the degree of transmission will be significantly reduced.

In an alternative embodiment, vertical air dynamics air may be supplied from overhead vents and removed by designed floor tiles.

Sampling of exhaust air may be carried out as described in section 2 above, and if viral load of exhaust air passes a set threshold, the crowd can be notified so that those who do not wish to run the risk of infection can leave. If the viral load exceeds a higher set threshold, the event will be terminated.

It should be noted that air quality in many clubs is already in need of improvement regardless of the pandemic, due to sweat, body odour, perfume, body heat,  low levels of oxygen and high levels of CO2, so the uptake of AQ management in clubs may eventually be widespread.

 

Discussion

                Cost

There will be a significant capital cost attached to fitting these air management tubes, fans, filters and sampling activities, but the costs will be recouped from increased revenue arising from higher attendance figures. It is possible that Government may be persuaded to subsidise these technologies in order to suppress the pandemic.

Apparatus will not have to be scrapped when the Covid-19 pandemic is over. Pandemics are arising more and more frequently as shown in this table:

Table 1

HIV/AIDS             ~1940

Ebola                     1976

Sars                        2002

Mers                     2012

Covid-19              2019

 

It can be seen that the interval between emergence of new infections is decreasing with time, and we can safely infer that new pandemics will occur from time to time, and therefore the demand for air dynamics management equipment will be sustained and increased.

 

                                Other measures

Air Dynamics Management  must be seen as one component of a systematic response rather than a magic bullet to stop the pandemic. Hand hygiene, social distancing, face coverings, fever scanning, and even tests for anosmia should be continued alongside ADM.

                               

                                Noise

Attention must be given to the problem of noise associated with air management. Tubes will be of  smooth bore rather than corrugated. Valves will be made of soft material, and the points of impact of valves will be designed to avoid noise. Air flow will be laminar, and as slow as is possible compatible with amounts required for respiration.

 

                                Safety

There is a serious responsibility undertaken in supplying air to hundreds of people. System integrity is vital since leaks in delivery tubes could result in dust or poor-quality air being delivered. Highest quality materials will be used, with levels of volatile organic compounds from the constituent plastics being kept as low as practically achievable, so material selection will be important. Potential breakdown in the system of delivery and exhaust air management must be monitored with regular checks.

 

                                Indirect positive effects of ADM

As knowledge of the testing aspect of ADM becomes general, people who are suffering symptoms of Covid-19, or who know that they have been in contact with the disease, will be inhibited from going out into crowded places for fear of being identified in public.

 

 

Conclusion

There is a strong case, both from a public health and a financial viewpoint, for venues management to consider which form of Air Dynamics Management would be most appropriate for their venue, and to set about installing it. Similarly, there is a strong case for manufacturers of air management equipment to set about designing, producing and marketing such equipment.

ADM delivery system

Figure 1

The author

Dr Richard Lawson MB BS, MRCPsych is a retired general practitioner of medicine, author of Bills of Health (Radcliffe Medical Press 1996, ISBN 1-85775-101-9), poet (In the Key of Blue (ISBN 978-1-78719-545-5), Green politician (Past national co-speaker, Green Party of England and Wales), past elected Local Authority Councillor, and inventor of physical technology (Aerosail, Phoenix bike stand, BrambleHook) and social inventor (Green Wage Subsidy).

The author asserts, and has protected, the intellectual property included in this paper.

rlawson@gn.apc.org

15/09/2020