Saturday, September 20, 2014
Thursday, September 18, 2014
Sonia Powell, 73, died in an ambulance while waiting for 35-minutes to be admitted to the A&E at Morriston Hospital, Swansea. She was seen by a doctor soon after her ambulance arrived, but the A&E was very busy.
There is to be an investigation.
The question I would put to the investigation is this:
Was Sonia's ambulance asked to wait before passing her into the care of A&E in order to meet the A&E's 4-hour target?
A&E departments are required to ensure that 95% of their cases be in their department for no more than 4 hours before they are discharged or admitted to a ward.
It is often pretty demanding to meet this target. In busy times, staff have to do one of these things:
- work quicker, which brings with it the risk of mistakes, which lead to complaints, which lead to staff being off sick or working while in a depressed and anxious state, which leads to more complaints
- get wards to accept patients quicker, before a firm diagnosis has been made, which may mean the patient is put on the wrong ward, which may lead to complaints, which lead to staff being off sick or working while in a depressed and anxious state, which leads to more complaints
- reduce the rate at which people come in through the doors of A&E. The way to do this is to leave patients coming in by ambulance in the care of the ambulance crews. These patients are technically not in A&E and so do not figure in the target statistics.
I have been in this situation, on a trolley outside the door of A&E, chatting to my ambulance crew. I was not acutely ill, and would personally rather not have been there, but a nurse from a MIU had insisted I go in order to avoid risk of a complaint, even though I had told her I was not a complainer.
My ambulance and crew were out of action during my 20-30 minute wait, leaving their colleagues on the road more busy, which brings with it the risk of mistakes, which lead to &c.
Sonia Powell was not that old. She may or may not have had multiple problems that doomed her to die. She might have died in A&E or on the ward - or she might not.
The investigation may decide that one factor in her death was the 4 hour waiting target. Or it may not.
In the end, to avoid mistakes, A&E departments do not need targets set by politicians and applied by managers. They need adequate levels of medical, nursing and diagnostic staff.
Having posted this, I tweeted this to the excellent Malcolm McKenzie, A&E consultant, who informed me most politely that what you have just been reading is wrong. However, it may be a bit right imo.
Saturday, September 13, 2014
Friday, September 12, 2014
I wrote this when Pope John Paul II died.
Now Ian Paisley has died too.
Wonder what they will have to say to each other.
Please note the prophetic accuracy of the last line.
Lines on the Death of John Paul II
"No Popery!" Ian Paisley cried,
and now that John Paul II has died,
there is no Pope,
so can we hope
for Orangemen with peace inside?
They just can't cope
without a Pope.
The Papists want a Papacy
and Paisley needs an enemy.
Without a Pope
they'd all just . . . mope.
It really makes you think:
what if it pushed them off the brink ?
what if it made them turn to drink
or even . . . turn to dope?
Might be a blessing in disguise.
Imagine, if the smokes that rise
above the Convocation
(while they all grope
for a new pope)
should symbolise a wider scope
What if the newly chosen Pope,
red-eyed, and reading Rattigan,
around the Vatican
flashing the peace sign,
Wow. Yeah. Wow. Yeah. Fine.
But that could be a slippery slope
No-one would want a hippy Pope.
We should not hope
for a doped pope;
But could we hope for one
that has a decent sense of fun?
(Maybe when Ratzinger’s gone?)
(c) Richard Lawson