Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human rights. Show all posts

Friday, October 14, 2011

International War Crime Investigation into Liam Fox' Sri Lankan friends

Liam Fox is no more, but the murderous Sri Lanka regime which he befriended is still in place.

Amnesty International has created a petition on the White House petition site today asking the U.S. to support an international war crimes investigation in Sri Lanka. We are asking all who understand this ongoing issue to please sign the petition by Oct. 29 (and encourage their friends and family to do so as well).

We need at least 5,000 signatures by Oct. 29.  The petition can be found at:  http://wh.gov/4oa

This comes from the excellent Tim Martin
Director Act Now 

Friday, March 18, 2011

UN R2P action on Libya: out with Ghaddafi, and out with Kelvin MacKenzie

Today I feel both relieved and anxious.

Relieved that the UN has finally got its act together to intervene against the criminal Ghaddafi.

Anxious that the intervention may cause civilian deaths, and may be protracted.
I feel responsible, since I am among those who called for a No-Fly Zone, albeit an Arab-led NFZ. At least we have Arab League involvement and support.

The intervention is late, which means that it is more of a challenge than it would have been 2 or 3 weeks ago. The intervention is right, because if Ghaddafi crushes the freedom fighters, dictators all over the world would take Gaddafi's response as their template, and use force to crush any dissent.

Democracy throughout the world has been in retreat over the past few years, and dictatorships have been on the rise. A Ghaddafi victory could have speeded this process, bringing about a world dominated by dictatorships who stifle free speech, imprison and torture dissenters and human rights activists, and indulge their appetite for  luxury and the machinery of death.

It is devoutly to be hoped that the international action is speedily effective in bringing Ghaddafi down.

Yesterday on Question Time the loudmouth ex-Sun editor Kelvin MacKenzie ranted about how Gaddafi is nothing to do with us. Yes it bloody is, Kelvin, because we supplied some of the weapons that he is using to kill civilians.  We have intervened already, in a bad way, and so we are obliged to go in and correct the imbalances that we have created. The likes of MacKenzie will be the first to complain about the wave of Libyan refugees who would come to Europe as a result of a Ghaddafi victory.

MacKenzie is blind to the fact that we live in an interconnected, mutually interdependent world. That is an unavoidable fact of political ecology.  We cannot live in our little individualised white England. We live in a dynamic, interlinked world. John Donne saw this interconnectedness four centuries ago: "Ask not for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee".

It is simply not possible for us to sit back and ignore the effects or our own prior actions. It is necessary for us to correct our actions, by stopping the global arms trade, and by acting in our own country in a liberal democratic way, especially with demonstrators - something else that MacKenzie would oppose - but when our actions bring significant human rights abuses from dictators that we have had trade with, the only right action is to give real physical assistance to the people who hunger and thirst for democracy.

MacKenzie isolationism is inhumane, ignorant and wrong.  The alternative - legal intervention against Ghaddafi's war machine - is problematic, difficult, but right, in that it is a blow struck not just against the Libyan tyrant, but against tyrants everywhere.

The Question Time discussion last night was worrying in the amount of ignorance that came up in the discussion, from both audience and panel speakers. Simon Hughes  was the only one who mentioned the UN stance of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), which rightly places an obligation on states to intervene against regimes who commit crimes.  There was much agonising about the risk of committing our troops to Libya, whereas the UN Resolution specifically excludes this option.

The best outcome is the speedy departure of Ghaddafi from Libya, even if it is on a jet plane to retirement in Zimbabwe. It is still the case that jamming of Ghaddafi's TV and radio broadcasts could help to bring this forward sooner, by loosening his grip on the minds of his supporters.  Maybe the non-interventionists in the Green Party will eventually take up this non-violent line of action. I have emailed my MP on this matter, and have been trying for 3 days to speak to him on the phone about it. Maybe today.

So, the struggle continues. The UN has at last intervened. Let us all hope that the end of the Ghaddafi regime will come soon, and that other dictatorships world wide will give way peacefully to the tsunami of democratic aspiration that is sweeping the world.


----

Link to text of UN resolution

Monday, February 21, 2011

What can we do to stop states like Libya killing protesters?

Here is a letter to your MP that you can copy, modify and email to your MP here.
It is more powerful if you also send a hard copy by mail to your MP at House of Commons, London SW1A  OAA





Dear [MP name]

In common with everyone who watches the news, I am deeply impressed by the courage and determination of the secular democratic movements in the Southern Mediterranean, and shocked by the use of lethal force  by regimes against unarmed civilian protesters.

The Foreign Secretary has been forthright in his condemnation of the state-sponsored killings, but deeds are needed as well as words.

Swiss banks froze the accounts of Hosni Mubarak the moment he left office, with the City taking similar action on the estimated $5 billion he holds in UK accounts.

The state violence could be inhibited were HMG to notify all regimes that in the event of their using or permitting lethal force to be used against unarmed civilians, it will be deemed a crime, and their legitimacy will immediately be called into question, and their assets will be frozen, as they would in the case of any other criminal.

At the same time, all UK registered corporations should be notified that if any regime uses said lethal force, they will be required to suspend all dealings in that country until a new democratic government is in place.

I would be most grateful if you would put these points to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

Sincerely

[your name]

Monday, July 26, 2010

Peter Tatchell's acceptance speech

Peter Tatchell's acceptance speech for Honorary Doctorate at Sussex University, awarded for 43 years of human rights activism

Dedicated to the people of Iran fighting for democracy and freedom


23 July 2010 – Brighton

Full text of Peter Tatchell’s acceptance speech, on receipt of his
Honorary Doctorate of Letters, conferred by Sussex University and
presented by the university’s Chancellor, Sanjeev Bhaskar, in a
ceremony at Brighton Dome on 23 July 2010.

Peter Tatchell, who is human rights spokesperson for the Green Party
of England & Wales, and the most courageous person I know, said:

Chancellor, Vice-Chancellor, members of faculty, family and friends,
and fellow graduands, to whom I offer my congratulations.
Congratulations on your hard work – and success.

My gratitude to Prof Morely for her most generous oration, and to the
University of Sussex for conferring on me such a high award.

I was hesitant about accepting this honour. After all, my doctorate
has not been earned by academic study, and my contribution to human
rights is very modest. Many others are much more deserving than me.

Nevertheless, after so many years of demonisation by the tabloid
press, right-wingers, homophobes and even by some people on the left
and in the LGBT community, this recognition is much appreciated.

In accepting this award, I pay tribute to the heroic, inspirational
activists I have worked alongside, including activists in Uganda,
Somaliland, Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Baluchistan, Nigeria,
Zimbabwe, Western Sahara, Iraq, Palestine and West Papua.

The greatest honour I’ve had in my life is the privilege to know and
support so many amazing, courageous human rights defenders around the
world. I walk in their shadow, humbled by their bravery and sacrifice.

I dedicate my acceptance of this honorary doctorate to the people of
Iran who are struggling against clerical dictatorship, for democracy
and freedom.

In particular, Mansour Osanloo, the jailed Iranian trade union leader,
and Sakineh Ashtiani, who has been sentenced to be stoned to death,
along with more than 20 other Iranians.

I express my solidarity with Iran’s persecuted Sunni Muslims and its
oppressed national minorities: including the Arab, Kurdish and Baluch
peoples.

I’m not special or unique. I do my bit for social justice, but so do
many others. Together, through our collective efforts, we are slowly,
but surely, helping make a better world – a world more just and free.

My key political inspirations are Mohandas Gandhi, Sylvia Pankhurst,
Martin Luther King and, to some extent, Malcolm X and Rosa Luxemburg.
I’ve adapted many of their ideas and methods to the contemporary
struggle for human rights – and invented a few of my own.

I began campaigning in my home town of Melbourne, Australia, in 1967, aged 15.

My first human rights campaign was against the death penalty, followed
by campaigns in support of Aboriginal rights and in opposition to
conscription and the Australian and US war against the people of
Vietnam.

In 1969, on realising that I was gay, the struggle for queer freedom
became an increasing focus of my activism.

After moving to London in 1971, I became an activist in the Gay
Liberation Front; organising sit-ins at pubs that refused to serve
queers, and organising protests against police harassment and the
medical classification of homosexuality as an illness.

I was roughed up and forcibly ejected when I challenged the world
famous psychologist, Professor Hans Eysenck, during a lecture in 1972,
where he advocated electric shock aversion therapy to supposedly
‘cure’ homosexuality.

The following year, in East Berlin, I was arrested and interrogated by
the secret police - the Stasi - after staging the first gay rights
protest in a communist country.

I have continued in the same vein for four decades, with many
controversial protests: such as taking over the pulpit and condemning
the Archbishop of Canterbury on Easer Sunday 1998, two attempted
citizen’s arrests of President Mugabe of Zimbabwe, confronting Mike
Tyson over his homophobia, and outing 10 Church of England Bishops in
1994.

The bishops were outed, not because they were gay but because they
were hypocrites. They colluded with the church’s anti-gay stance in
public but were gay in private. They were outed because of their
homophobia and hypocrisy, not because of their homosexuality.

I was widely criticised at the time. Critics said I had no real
evidence that the bishops were gay. Not true. I had the evidence. I
was gratified some years later when a doctor approached me to confirm
that he knew one of the bishops was definitely gay. He told me that
the unnamed bishop was a patient and once came to his surgery with a
rectal problem. The doctor asked the bishop to show him where the
problem was. Dropping his trousers and pointing to his bottom the
bishop said: “It’s here, just by the entrance.” To which the doctor
replied: “Excuse me bishop, most us call it the exit.”

Looking back on my 43 years of human rights campaigning, my advice,
for what it’s worth, is this:

Be sceptical, question authority, be a rebel. Do not conform and don’t
be ordinary.

Remember, all human progress is the result of far-sighted people
challenging orthodoxy, tradition and rich, powerful, vested interests.

Be daring, show imagination, take risks.

Fight against the greatest human rights violation of all: free market
capitalism, which has created a world divided into rich and poor,
where hundreds of millions of people are malnourished, homeless,
without clean drinking water and dying from hunger and preventable
diseases.

Don’t accept the world as it is. Dream about what the world could be –
then help make it happen.

In whatever field of endeavour you work, be a change-maker for the
upliftment of humanity.

To quote my fellow sodomite and socialist Oscar Wilde:

“We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.”


Read more about Peter Tatchell’s four decades of human rights
campaigning here:
http://www.petertatchell.net/biography/biography2007.htm

And about his current campaigns here:
www.petertatchell.net

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Obama Appeal by Tamil hunger striker

Obama Appeal: "Tim Martin, a former aid worker and the Campaign Director of Act Now, is on an indefinite hunger strike outside Parliament, London since Monday 18th May. Tim is calling upon US President Obama to intervene in the crisis in Sri Lanka and has presented a clear list of demands to protect the civilian population from further devastation. Tim’s full letter to the American president was delivered to the American Embassy on the first day of his hunger strike.


Tim has lived and worked as an aid worker in the northern region of Sri Lanka, the area where the conflict has been taking place, and seen the scale of the mistreatment of Tamils firsthand. Even though the war is now over thousands of lives are still at risk, thousands of innocent civilians and POWs are currently not receiving proper medical treatment and if emergency treatment is not made available in the immediate future thousands more civilians will die."

Please sign. Just fill in your details and click - your details will be entered on the form automatically.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Amnesty International calls for accountbility in Gaza

AIUK : Gaza: "With two shaky and unilateral ceasefires now in place in Gaza a huge humanitarian relief effort is needed immediately. With evidence of war crimes committed by both sides during the crisis, there must also be a full and independent investigation to bring those responsible to justice."

You can take action on the linked page, writing to HMG, UNSC, and seeking the release of Gilad Shalit.

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Sex offenders' register and human rights

Thousands of convicted sex attackers may now be able to challenge their positions on the sex offenders register, after a landmark High Court case ruled that forcing them to remain on the list for life was a breach of their human rights. Independent, Saturday, 20 December 2008

Three presiding judges at the High Court in London agreed that keeping the two offenders on the register for life, without giving them the chance to prove that they were no longer a danger to the public, would be “incompatible” with human rights legislation.


This could be a big issue. I zip off to see what the Daily Mail has to say, but they have no rant on offer, just a load of celebrity froth. They've missed one there. Normally the Mail is big on attacking the "Human Rights (HR) for Offenders" PC stuff. This worries me, as stupid court decisions on HR devalues the currency, and encourages the Mail to attack HR in general.

There is a case to be made. How does a sex offender "prove" that he is no longer a threat to the public?

Well, there is an answer. The male offender puts on a penile plethysmograph, and is shown sexual imagery. The PP records tiny reactions to the images.

Yes, it is not infallible (nothing is, not even your judgments, M'Lud) but in the context of other, more conventional assessments of the person, it can help to come to an accurate judgment of whether a pedophile* is still a danger to society.

While we are at it, some paedophiles can be cured pharmacologically. Just thought I'd mention it.

This is not official Green Party Policy.
*using american spelling to pick up the search engines. Americans don't do diphthongs (but they do do thongs).

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Human Rights Index (beta version) for 2006

The Political Terror Scale 2006 is generated by Mark Gibney Belk Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Asheville.

He takes at all available data from Amnesty International and US State Department country reports on human rights practice, and turns them into a 5-band scale. Low score means high Human Rights standards, so 2 is the best, and 10 is the worst. I am very grateful to him for being able to reproduce part of his work here.

I have added together the figures derived from the two sources, so a score of 2 indicates level 1, score 4 indicates level 2, and so on. Odd numbers mean that the country is on the border between two groups, which arises when there is divergence between the reports from Amnesty and the State Department.

Countries are arranged alphabetically, so position within each block is not significant, but a country's group level is significant.


Level 1 : Countries under a secure rule of law, people are not imprisoned for their view, and torture is rare or exceptional. Political murders are extremely rare.

Score 2:

Australia
Bhutan
Brunei
Canada
Cape Verde
Comoros
Costa Rica
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
Germany
Grenada
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Luxembourg
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Oman
Panama
Sao Tome and Principe
Seychelles
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Sweden
Taiwan
Uruguay
Vanuatu

Score 3:

Bahamas
Bahrain
Belgium
Chile
Czech Republic
Latvia
Lithuania
Malta
Poland
Qatar
Singapore
South Korea
Switzerland


Level 2 : There is a limited amount of imprisonment for nonviolent political activity. However, few persons are affected, torture and beatings are exceptional. Political murder is rare.

Score 4:

Argentina
Armenia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Barbados
Belize
Bosnia
Botswana
Croatia
Cyprus
Fiji
France
Hungary
Kuwait
Lesotho
Macedonia
Madagascar
Mali
Namibia
Nicaragua
Niger
Portugal
Slovakia
Spain
St. Lucia
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Suriname
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom

Score 5:

Albania
Bolivia
Bulgaria
Congo
Ghana
Greece
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Kazakhstan
Malaysia
Maldives
Moldova
Mongolia
Romania
Rwanda
Sierra Leone
Tanzania
Trinidad and Tobago
Vietnam
Yugoslavia


Level 3 : There is extensive political imprisonment, or a recent history of such imprisonment. Execution or other political murders and brutality may be common. Unlimited detention, with or without a trial, for political views is accepted.


Score 6:

Angola
Belarus
Benin
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Cuba
Djibouti
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Guinea
Honduras
Indonesia
Jamaica
Jordan
Kyrgyz Republic
Laos
Lebanon
Liberia
Libya
Malawi
Mauritania
Morocco
Mozambique
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
South Africa
Swaziland
Syria
Tajikistan
Togo
Tunisia
Turkmenistan
Ukraine
United States
Yemen
Zambia
Uzbekistan

Score 7

Cameroon
East Timor
Ethiopia
Haiti
India
Kenya
Mexico
Turkey
Venezuela

Level 4 : Civil and political rights violations have expanded to large numbers of the population. Murders, disappearances, and torture are a common part of life. In spite of its generality, on this level terror affects those who interest themselves in politics or ideas.

Score 8:

Algeria
Bangladesh
Brazil
Burundi
Chad
China
Egypt
Eritrea
Guatemala
Iran
Israel
Ivory Coast
Nigeria
North Korea
Pakistan
Philipines
Russia
Somalia
Thailand
Uganda
West Bank and Gaza
Zimbabwe

Score 9:

Central African Republic
Colombia
Dem. Republic of the Congo
Myanmar
Nepal

Level 5 : Terror has expanded to the whole population. The leaders of these societies place no limits on the means or thoroughness with which they pursue personal or ideological goals.

Score 10:

Afghanistan
Iraq
Sri Lanka
Sudan

Countries for which there is no data:
"Germany, East" **
"Germany, West" **
Samoa **
USSR **
"Yemen, North" **
"Yemen, South" **

The USA was not rated by the State Department, so I doubled the Amnesty score of 3, which is a median rating.

This is a prototype of the real Index of Human Rights which we would like to see established by the United Nations. The group system is clunky, and it would be better to give each country an individual score, so that the scale could be viewed as a spectrum. There is no reason that I can see that the reports should not be quantified in this way.

Of interest is the UK's poor showing with a score of 4, (Level 2), and that of the USA with a score of 6, Level 3. Israel is at Level 4, while there is no data for the Palestinian Authority.

It is enlightening to view an objective rating of all the countries of the world. To read the newspapers, one might be led to think that the UK and USA were paragons of democratic virtue.

Some of the results are startling. For instance, we share Level 2 with Azerbaijan, and the USA shares Level 3 with Saudi Arabia and - wait for it - Cuba. This is a result of the group system, since there will be wide variations within a group. If you have doubt about the accuracy of the scores, simply go back to the State Department website and read the country reports. I could not find the country reports on the AI website: I think you have to buy a copy written on pulped trees.

The Green Party is to launch a Report on the Index of Human Rights on December 8th.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

The Colour Orange

Introducing The Color Orange as a symbol of the protest against the human rights violations in China. Strict censorship can ban the use of obvious symbols of human rights, but the use of The Color Orange cannot be banned.

Click the link above, in the title, to join a simple, but powerful mass movement to shame the Chinese Government out of their repressive stance, and to bring forward a wise statesman who can lead China back into the ways of going with the flow of natural reality.