In looking at immigration into the UK, we need to look at causes. To look at causes, we need to view the rate of migration from a particular country. I have taken the figures on immigration in 2008 from the Guardian's Factfile series, which give top applications for citizenship in 2008, and divided the population of the sending country by the number of applications. There are about 200 countries on the list, so I have sampled the top 18 senders.
This gives a proportional rate of emigration from the country. The smaller the number, the greater the proportion of the country that wants to emigrate to the UK. It does not give an absolute figure, because citizens who emigrate to other countries are not counted. Countries with strong ties with the UK (Commonwealth status, or English-speaking,) will be more likely to come here.
So here is the list of the top 18 senders:
Country Rate of immigration to UK
1 Jamaica 1001
2 Somalia 1,275
3 Zimbabwe 2,193
4 Iraq 3,456
5 Afghanistan 5,081
6 Sri Lanka 6,161
7 Ghana 7,603
8 South Africa 9,368
9 Turkey 15,638
10 Pakistan 17,042
11 Phillipines 17,142
12 Australia 18,767
13 Nigeria 34,156
14 Iran 33,725
15 Bangladesh 44,627
16 India 99,820
17 USA 140,223
18 China 467,591
I have put in bold the countries where there is a current or recent war, or civil conflict, or an oppressive regime.
5 of the top 6 strongest sending countries come from countries at war - two of which are wars chosen by our Government.
The conclusion is that individuals and parties who are concerned about immigration into the UK should take an active interest in world peace, international co-operation, Human Rights, and world poverty.
Paradoxically, parties like UKIP and the BNP tend to be averse both to immigration and world affairs, which shows a deep logical inconsistency in their thinking.
Tuesday, May 04, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
and to paraphrase the immense Chris Morris:
"immigration that we don't know about, is going up as well"
I presume you haven't included the hard to quantify 'illegal' immigration? Not that I mind. You might think I do, raising the above point but no, the more the merrier for me.
Illegals are the Rumsfeltian unknown unknown. The answer there is clearly some kind of amnesty, but reason is drowning in impressions in this media driven election.
Thanks for commenting.
Post a Comment